Category Archives: Immigration News

Latest Developments in U.S. Immigration Law

Deferred Action for Dreamers a Step in the Right Direction

Published in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette Op-Ed Section
August 14, 2012
By Kamana Mathur

On Wednesday, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service will begin  accepting applications for “deferred action” — two-year relief from deportation  — for otherwise-law-abiding immigrants under 31 who were brought to this  country as children. This controversial measure was announced by President  Barack Obama on June 15 after repeated efforts to pass the Dream Act were  defeated by Senate filibuster — despite overwhelming bipartisan support in both  Houses.

Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Jose Vargas’ announcement last year that he  was an “illegal alien” surprised most of us. How could he have lived and worked  as a well-known journalist for so many years undetected?

Mr. Vargas was brought to the United States by his grandparents when he was  12. He did not realize he was “illegal” until he applied for a driver’s license  years later.

His announcement in The New York Times sparked a heated debate on the  contribution of illegal aliens to American society and the plight of the young  “dreamers.” Perhaps his announcement did what 10 years of efforts to pass the  Dream Act could not — it put pressure on the White House to take action when  Congress failed to do so.

Critics were vocal: Can the president do this? Isn’t this amnesty? Aren’t we  encouraging further violations of the law? But the measure was applauded by most  Americans. Perhaps it was their sense of fair play, or compassion for the more  than 800,000 young people who have been living in the shadows of the only  society they have ever known.

Most young immigrants are hardworking, law-abiding individuals who grew up  going to school, working and serving honorably in our military. They are our  friends and neighbors — we probably don’t even know they are here without  “documents.”

Carlos D’Souza will benefit from the president’s order. He was brought here  by his father when he was 10. They crossed the border into Texas, after giving  their life savings to a smuggler. They had hoped to work and save enough to send  money to sick family members back home. But when they arrived, they didn’t have  enough to pay their Texan handlers. They were sold into slavery to the owner of  a Chinese restaurant in Arizona. Carlos and his dad washed dishes, mopped floors  and cleared tables without pay for a year to settle their debt.

The president’s decision was based on sound economics and the principle of  “prosecutorial discretion” — in addition to fairness and compassion. The  government just does not have the $285 billion it would cost to deport the 11  million illegal aliens present in our country. Aren’t our limited resources  better spent deporting criminal aliens instead of punishing youngsters for the  acts of their parents? Is forcing young people to leave the only life they have  never known for the country of their birth really worth the $12,500 to $23,500  it costs taxpayers per individual deported? Instead, under this measure,  applicants will pay $465 to apply, generating millions of dollars in  revenue.

There are many things this order does not do. It does not grant legal status.  Applicants do not get a green card or citizenship. They can apply for  authorization to work legally and pay taxes — but only for two years.

So why all the hoopla? The measure is a narrow exercise of prosecutorial  discretion, which is deeply entrenched in our legal system, not a law.

Even the broad-based amnesty program launched by President Ronald Reagan  under the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 resulted in a decrease  rather than an increase in border crossings, because it was wisely combined with  stepped-up border security and employer penalties, something the Obama  administration also has focused on. That law was premised on the fact that it is  too costly and administratively difficult to round up and deport individuals who  came here to work and support their families. Many had no means to do so in  their own country.

Those who believe President Obama is soft on illegal immigration should look  at the numbers: He has deported almost 400,000 illegal aliens annually, most of  them with criminal records. This is double the number deported under the George  W. Bush administration.

During the last few years, with jobs hard to find, the number of illegal  aliens entering the United States also has dropped dramatically. Raids on  employers of illegals have increased.

Who qualifies for “deferred action?” Those who, among other things, have  committed no serious crimes, arrived in the United States when they were under  16; had continuously resided here for at least five years prior to June 15 and  are in school, have graduated from high school, have a GED or have an honorable  discharge from the armed forces.

With this one action, the president has brought hope not only to the  “dreamers” but to millions of Americans who believe a child should not be  punished for the wrongdoing of his parents, who believe almost a million people  who have lived here most of their lives should be able to come out of the  woodwork, work legally, pay taxes and live without fear in the only home they  have ever known.

Kamana Mathur is an immigration lawyer  at MathurLaw LLC in Greentree (www.MathurLaw.us). First Published August 14, 2012  12:00 am

Read more:
http://www.post-gazette.com/stories/opinion/perspectives/the-two-year-reprieve-begins-allowing-young-immigrants-to-stay-makes-a-lot-of-sense-648897/#ixzz23YFBIACV

Temporary Protected Status for Haitians

In response to the earthquakes in Haiti, the U.S. is granting Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Haitian nationals currently in the U.S.  TPS would permit these individuals to stay and work in the U.S.  legally and suspend deportation proceedings. Those approved for TPS will be permitted to stay and work in the U.S. for 18 months – this can sometimes be extended.  However, they must file for this status within 180 days in order to qualify.  Thousands of undocumented Haitians nationwide are expected to apply for TPS status.

Immigration Reform at Last?

By Kamana Mathur
MathurLaw LLC

On December 16, Rep. Gutierrez introduced a Comprehensive Immigration Reform (CIR) Bill, HR 4321, called the “Comprehensive Immigration Reform for America’s Security and Prosperity Act of 2009” (CIR ASAP).  The Bill aims to encourage legal immigration by making more visas available to U.S. educated  advanced-degree professionals or those possessing a critically needed skill.  It also treats spouses of permanent residents on par with spouses of U.S. Citizens, going a long way to eliminating the long separation that spouses and families of Green Card holders must often endure.  At the same time, the Bill seeks to deter illegal immigration by increasing penalties for employers who willfully flout immigration laws in their hiring process and also steps up border security.  The Bill also  includes a path to legalization for those undocumented workers who have lived, worked, and paid taxes here, involving payment of fines and waiting six years before becoming eligible for permanent residency.

Passage of this Bill will not be easy.  Controversial provisions such as the path to legalization for undocumented  workers were responsible for the failure of similar bills introduced in previous years.  The time is ripe to pass a common sense bill that will keep families together, discourage illegal immigration, and allow the hardworking and talented individuals that form the backbone of our nation live and work here and contribute to America’s innovation, technical leadership, and financial security.  While there are valid arguments on both sides of the legalization issue, passing legislation that will prevent husbands and wives and parents and children from being separated for years on end is just common sense – it’s the American way.  I urge you to contact your Congressman and Senator and let them know that you support legislation that would unite families and encourage legal immigration.

A Family Torn Apart

By Kamana Mathur
MathurLaw LLC

It was with great excitement and a little trepidation that Jacintha Mary, her husband Benjamin, and daughters Deepika and Preethi went to the Consulate in Chennai, India  2 ½ years ago to get their visas to come to the United States.   Jacintha, a registered nurse, had received a job offer to work in Pittsburgh.  

No one in their family had ever been outside the country, and their parents were not happy at the prospect of them going so far away.  But Jacintha and Benjamin wanted a better life for their girls – a life they had thus far only read about and seen in films.  

Jacintha worked at a medical research center and Benjamin had a government job, but they found it hard to make ends meet.  They still could not afford to buy a house or car, or any of the amenities we take for granted here in America.  This step of taking a job and moving to a country half-way across the globe would help them provide their children with the opportunities they had always dreamed of.  The girls would get a first class education and be able to achieve their true potential.  And today was the day they would receive their ‘Green Cards’ to the land of their dreams. 

There was just one problem. Benjamin and Jacintha had submitted their passports at the same time in order to get a police clearance from the passport office, as requested in their interview letter.  As the clearance needed to be less than six months old, they had been advised not to apply for it until they were called for an

Deepika and Preethi appeal to Obama

Deepika and Preethi appeal to Obama

interview.  Surprisingly, Jacintha got hers the same day, but Benjamin was told they needed to conduct further checks, even though he had a brand new passport and had never had any problems with the law.  

Jacintha, Deepika, and Preethi got their ‘Green Cards’ that day.  Benjamin was told he could not get his visa until he provided the missing document.  The family, minus Benjamin, got on a flight to the U.S. a few months later.  Jacintha’s employer was waiting for her to join.  Despite their joy at finally getting this opportunity, the young family left for America with a heavy heart – their father was to remain behind.  Hopefully, he would join them soon.

However, as fate would have it, the visa number that had been reserved for Benjamin was returned unused at the end of the month – a fact the family had not known.  When Benjamin later provided the missing document to the Consulate in Chennai, he was informed that a visa number was no longer available for him.  In fact, the “priority date” for his visa had retrogressed from 2005 to 2001, and seemed to keep moving backwards.

The first thought that came to the family was to apply for a temporary visa for Benjamin, so that he could at least come and see his family.  Again, our visa policies made that a virtual impossibility.  Once listed on an immigrant petition, an individual is presumed to have “immigrant intent” and therefore is not eligible for a “non-immigrant” or temporary visa.  

Deepika and Preethi  go to bed every night without feeling the warm embrace of their father’s arms.  They no longer hear the bedtime stories they would excitedly wait for their father to tell them.  The girls have grown, made friends, and are happy to be in America.   But they long for the day their father can join them here.  Hopefully, that day will come before he becomes a distant memory.  

True, Jacintha can quit her job as a critical care nurse at the Children’s Institute, where she cares for children with head and spinal cord injuries, and move back to India.  She can pull her children out of school and take them away from their friends and the life they cherish.  But would that be a good thing for America?  

Certainly not, say her friends and co-workers at the Children’s Institute.  Not only would we lose an honest, hardworking nurse filling a critical need caring for our children, it would be a sad reflection on America that we cannot hold on to our talent due to our flawed visa policies.  

The time for Immigration Reform is NOW.  As a nation of immigrants, it’s time we rewarded those who play by the rules, wait their turn, and come to the United States to work hard for America and Americans.

Why Not Let Immigrants Fuel Our Economic Recovery?

By Kamana Mathur
MathurLaw LLC

Given the current recession, immigration reform has taken a back seat to bailout plans, energy independence, the war in the Middle East, and practically everything else.  With the increasing number of jobless Americans, how can we as a nation justify immigrant-friendly policies? Immigration has always been a subject of heated debate.  We have accused immigrants of taking away American jobs, increasing crime, and fundamentally changing our way of life.  Economists have long argued the opposite – that immigrants by taking jobs U.S. workers are unwilling or unable to do, make us a more productive and competitive nation.  Immigrants come here to make a life for themselves and their families.  They work hard, pay taxes, and try to fit in.

The bottom line at a time of high-unemployment is this: does immigration help or hurt America and Americans? Some interesting studies, one most recently done by Kerr and Lincoln at the Harvard Business School, indicate a strong correlation between immigration and the number of patents filed in the U.S.  The link could be attributed to the fact that individuals who are willing to take the risk of leaving their known surroundings to immigrate to the U.S. tend to be more innovative in thinking and more entrepreneurial in spirit.  They are more likely to find innovative problems-solving solutions and take the risk of starting a new enterprise in an effort to attain the “American dream.”  A spinoff effect is that those who work, play, or study with them tend to become more innovative in thinking as well.

Pittsburgh has a long history of immigration.  During the early 1900’s, a large number of German, Polish, and other workers were brought here to work in the coal mines.  With the decline of the steel industry, workers lost their jobs but stayed here in Pittsburgh. 

Currently, with the “reinvention” of Pittsburgh as a high-tech haven and medical super-center, it is attracting another type of immigrant – a highly educated, professional worker in the engineering, high-tech, or medical field.  Although Hispanics constitute the largest immigrant group in the U.S., Pittsburgh is home to more Indian immigrants that any other nationality.  But with job losses across the board, it is not surprising that employment-based immigration to the U.S. has started to decline, and this trend is likely to continue.

Congress is burdening taxpayers with the costs of bailing out industries in order to stave off even more job losses.  But why not use immigrants to bail out the economy?  We already provide E2 visas to those individuals from select countries who are willing to start or invest in a business in the U.S.  Why not expand the program to individuals from more countries?  A little-known visa category, the EB-5, qualifies foreign investors for a Green Card if they are willing to invest at least $500,000 in a “targeted employment area” and create at least 10 jobs.  Pittsburgh is one such area.  We would do well to seek out such investors, individuals who could not only create jobs and invest in our growth, but who would make Pittsburgh a more attractive place for the young and talented. 

America is undoubtedly one of the most desirable places to live in the world.  Here, we can still reap the benefits of hard work and enterprise, express our opinions freely, and live wherever we choose.   We should consider taking steps to attract the many well-qualified, hardworking, and talented people from all over the world who would like to live, work, and invest in our country. It is time the Obama Administration take a close look at our immigration policies and make it easier for foreign investors to come to the U.S., start businesses, create jobs, and help rebuild our nation.

Obama and the Future of Immigration

By Kamana Mathur
MathurLaw LLC

The Economy is in the doldrums.  Baby boomers nearing retirement have lost their nest eggs in the volatile market.  Jobless numbers are the highest in years.  Given these pressing issues, immigration reform has taken a back seat to bailout plans, energy independence, the war in the Middle East, and practically everything else.  With the increasing number of jobless Americans, how can we as a nation justify immigrant-friendly policies?

Immigration has always been a subject of heated debate.  We have accused immigrants of taking away American jobs, increasing crime, and fundamentally changing our way of life.  Economists have long argued the opposite – that immigrants by taking jobs U.S. workers are unwilling or unable to do, make us a more productive and competitive nation.  Immigrants come here to make a life for themselves and their families.  They work hard, pay taxes, and try to fit in.

Pittsburgh has a long history of immigration.  During the early 1900’s, a large number of German, Polish, and other workers were brought here to work in the coal mines.  With the decline of the steel industry, workers lost their jobs but stayed here in Pittsburgh. 

Currently, with the “reinvention” of Pittsburgh as a high-tech haven and medical super-center, it is attracting another type of immigrant – a highly educated, professional worker in the engineering, high-tech, or medical field.  Although Hispanics constitute the largest immigrant group in the U.S., Pittsburgh is home to more Indian immigrants that any other nationality.  But with job losses across the board, it is not surprising that employment-based immigration to the U.S. has started to decline, and this trend is likely to continue.

Congress is burdening taxpayers with the costs of bailing out industries in order to stave off even more job losses.  But why not use immigrants to bail out the economy?  We already provide E2 visas to those individuals from select countries who are willing to start or invest in a business in the U.S.  Why not expand the program to individuals from more countries?  A little-known visa category, the EB-5, qualifies foreign investors for a Green Card if they are willing to invest at least $500,000 in a “targeted employment area” and create at least 10 jobs.  Pittsburgh is one such area.  We would do well to seek out such investors, individuals who could not only create jobs and invest in our growth, but who would make Pittsburgh a more attractive place for the young and talented. 

America is undoubtedly one of the most desirable places to live in the world.  Here, we can still reap the benefits of hard work and enterprise, express our opinions freely, and live wherever we choose.   We should consider taking steps to attract the many well-qualified, hardworking, and talented people from all over the world who would like to live, work, and invest in our country.

It is time the Obama Administration take a close look at our immigration policies and make it easier for foreign investors to come the U.S., start businesses, create jobs, and help rebuild our nation.

E-Verify Mandated for Federal Contractors/Sub-Contractors Effective January 15, 2009

By Kamana Mathur
MathurLaw LLC
www.MathurLaw.us

News Bulletin: E-Verify Mandate Delayed to February 20, 2009

The start date of the mandatory use of E-Verify by government contractors as described below has been postponed to February 20, 2009 pending the outcome of recent court challenges.  Federal Register/Vol. 74, No. 9/Wednesday, January 14, 2009.

IMPORTANT CHANGES IN EMPLOYMENT VERIFICATION LAWS, I-9 AND E-VERIFY EFFECTIVE  JAN 2009

The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA) requires employers to verify the identity and work eligibility of all employees (citizens and non-citizens) hired after November 6, 1986 using the Employment Eligibility Verification Form I-9.  Employers are prohibited from directly or indirectly hiring an alien who is not authorized to work in the U.S.  IRCA also prohibits discrimination against employees or prospective employees based on their national origin or citizenship status. 

Immigration Laws in the U.S. have undergone dramatic changes in recent years.  This includes increased enforcement of employment verification laws and regulations, and the imposition of severe civil and criminal penalties on those employers who fail to comply with the law, keep adequate records, or knowingly or with “gross disregard” of the facts maintain employees, contractors, or sub-contractors who are not legally authorized to work in the U.S.

Two recent changes Employers should be aware of in order to protect themselves from Civil and Criminal Liability are:

1.    New I-9 Rule Changes Documentation Requirements

DHS published on December 17, 2008 (Volume 73, No. 243) an interim final rule that changes the Employment Eligibility Verification (Form I-9) process. This rule narrows the list of acceptable identity documents and specifies that expired documents are no longer acceptable forms of identification.  Employers must use the revised Form I-9 for all new hires and to re-verify any employee with expiring employment authorization beginning 45 days (January 31, 2009) after publication in the Federal Register.  The current version of the Form I-9 (dated 06/05/2007) will no longer be valid.

Employers must complete a Form I-9 for all newly hired employees to verify their identity and authorization to work in the United States. The list of approved documents that employees can present to verify their identity and employment authorization is divided into three sections: List A documents verify identity and employment authorization, List B documents verify identity only, and List C documents verify employment authorization only.

The rule eliminates Forms I-688, I-688A, and I-688B (Temporary Resident Card and older versions of the Employment Authorization Card/Document) from List A. USCIS no longer issues these cards, and all that were in circulation have expired. The rule also adds to List A of Form I-9 foreign passports containing specially-marked machine-readable visas and documentation for certain citizens of the Federated States of Micronesia (FSM) and the Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI). The rule makes other, technical changes to update the list of acceptable documents. The revised Form I-9 includes additional changes, such as revisions to the employee attestation section, and the addition of the new U.S. Passport Card to List A.

2.    Use of EVERIFY Mandated for all Federal Contractors, Sub-Contractors, Suppliers, Vendors from January 15, 2009. 

E-Verify, a previously voluntary program that helps employers verify the legal status and eligibility to work of prospective employees, will be mandatory from January 15, 2009 for all Government Contractors, Sub-Contractors, affiliates, suppliers, vendors, or service providers pursuant to Amended Executive Order 12989 .  Information entered in E-Verify is matched with Social Security Administration (SSA) and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) records.  E-Verify will issue a confirmation, tentative confirmation, or final non-confirmation if the records do not match.  There are strict guidelines regarding Employer action (and inaction) following the issuance of such letters.  Fines, penalties, and even criminal charges resulting in prison time can ensue if appropriate action is not taken.
It is important that companies develop a compliance program that will ensure that all Immigration and Employment Discrimination Laws and regulations are being followed and protect companies from Civil or Criminal Liability in the event of non-compliance.